来源:Ars Technica · 科技 · 北美洲 · 05-15 01:28

Your doctor’s AI notetaker may be making things up, Ontario audit finds

阅读原文 →

AI 摘要

这条新闻显示「Your doctor’s AI notetaker may be making things up, Ontario audit finds」正在成为 科技产业 方向的新信号,值得结合 北美洲 与 科技 后续动态继续观察。

关键点

  • 核心事件:Your doctor’s AI notetaker may be making things up, Ontario audit finds
  • 所属领域:科技 / 科技产业
  • 观察维度:北美洲、Ars Technica 后续报道与同类事件是否继续增加

影响分析

短期可能影响产品路线、开发者生态与产业链预期;若同类新闻继续增加,可能形成新的科技主题。

情绪:中性偏积极 · 相关:Ars Technica / 科技 / 北美洲 / 科技产业 · 模板回退

In recent years, many overworked doctors have turned to so-called AI medical scribes to help automatically summarize patient conversations, diagnoses, and care decisions into structured notes for health record logging. But a recent audit by the auditor general of Ontario found that AI scribes recommended by the provincial government regularly generated incorrect, incomplete and hallucinated information that could "potentially result in inadequate or harmful treatment plans that may potentially impact patient health outcomes." In a recent report on Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Ontario Government, the auditor general reviewed transcription tests of two simulated patient-doctor conversations performed across 20 AI scribe vendors that were approved and pre-qualified by the provincial government for purchase by healthcare providers. All 20 of those vendors showed some issue with accuracy or completeness in at least one of these simple tests, including nine that hallucinated patient information, 12 that recorded information incorrectly, and 17 that missed key details about discussed mental health issues. In the report, the auditor general points out multiple concerning examples of mistakes in those summaries that could have a direct and negative impact on a patient's subsequent care. That includes situations where an AI scribe hallucinated nonexistent referrals for blood tests or therapy, incorrectly transcribed the names of prescription medication, and/or missed "key details" of mental health issues discussed in the simulated conversations.Read full article Comments

阅读原文 →